Subject: I have found a DVD that I think you would enjoy
|Anaconda 3 Offspring|
Actors: David Hasselhoff, Crystal Allen, Ryan McCluskey, Patrick Regis, Anthony Green
Director: Don E. FauntLeRoy
Genres: Action & Adventure, Horror, Science Fiction & Fantasy, Mystery & Suspense
A ruthless mercenary, Hammett (David Hasselhoff) and his team are on the hunt for a pair of giant snakes that have escaped and are on a mega-sized feeding frenzy. They must stop the onslaught before the reptiles reach the... more »
Similarly Requested DVDs
Member Movie Reviews
Chad B. (abrnt1) from CABERY, IL
Reviewed on 11/28/2012...
The first Anaconda film, while far from great, was at least entertaining. The sequel was pointless beyond belief. Part 3 is just as pointless as part 2. Anaconda is being made into a franchise for the exact same reason that Lake Placid was: Chance to cash in.
Why was this even made ? Anaconda go home ! Pointless bloody
D. Steigman | USA | 12/01/2008
(1 out of 5 stars)
"Why this was made is beyond me. Totally pointless. I think this was made to satisfy the needs of bloody SPFX people wanting to make disgusting gore. They succeeded but the film sucked ! This was as gory as a Lucio Fulci horror or even a Dario Argento movie, but nowhere remotely as good. Tons of squirting blood and snakes (very fake looking by the way) eating people. Scientists are creating a serum to fight cancer and Alzheimer's disease & use Anacondas to 'try it out' which of course escape their cages. Out comes David Hasselhoff and his gang of snake killers to stop them as if the half a dozen or so have a chance to shoot down 2 large anacondas. All very pointless. Just an ugly repulsive movie to watch. Made to satisfy people who like excessive gore and to satisfy the makers of this movie who wanted to make an excessively gory movie. This makes the first Anaconda movie look like Casablanca...this was a big piece of snake crap.."
Leave it Alone
Trevor Merris | Carmicheal, CA USA | 11/13/2008
(1 out of 5 stars)
"Anaconda was a ground breaking film in terms of Special Effects. Anacondas was a Theatrical flop yet rained in decent profits. Anaconda 3 SUCKS. and now SciFi is Making a Anaconda 4 or Anaconda 3.5. Picking up right after the third.
I am a great fan of the Anaconda films, first and second that is. How sci-fi got the rights to continue the series is beyond me. I like SciFi but lets face it, there movies arnt top Knotch, there REALLY REALLY CORNEY. Not a good Combo for a CGI Exciting Enterprise.
SciFi's Version, Anacondas 3: The Offering. is a disaster. First the CGI. all i have to say is SciFi Channel Effects. Not Good. Second, the Story. Plain Boring. (1)Snake Captures, (2)Snake Escsapes, (3)Snake Eats People, (4)SpecOps Kills Snake. Does SciFi ever use the Regular Army? Anyway, its a real dispappointment even compared to the Contriversal Original Sequal. and now there planning a Fourth! NOOOOOOOOOOO!"
Has about as much in common with Anaconda as Dino's Big Monk
new yorker | NYC | 11/08/2008
(2 out of 5 stars)
"2 Stars because it's no worse than than most Sci-Fi Channel fare. That being said why some suit thought turning a giant snake movie into a slasher film was a good idea is beyond me.If only they'd spent one tenth of the blood and prosthesis budget on a decent CGI model of an Anaconda. For that matter if they were going to include those shots of real snakes they could have used some with Anacondas instead of Boa Constrictors and Corn Snakes.Guess snakes all look alike to the Ophidiophobic."