Lu H. from BROOMFIELD, CO Reviewed on 11/1/2012...
This movie is very different from 2001 though it's based on the same story. It's pretty much a straight-forward science fiction, space travel story based on interesting characters and the difficulties of traveling through space to study other planets. Roy Schneider is good in the leading role and some of the supporting cast are interesting as well. The stories are tied in by the mysterious monolith and it's meaning and purpose are explained. The ending is kind of silly but it's a science fiction story afterall, I guess.
Transfer is not standard DVD resolution
wademasshardt | Madison, WI United States | 02/04/2002
(3 out of 5 stars)
"Once again, the stupid people responsible for doing transfers do an inferior transfer. Instead of using the standard DVD resolution of 720x480, they chose instead to use something more like 640x427. Honestly, I don't understand why they decide to do it this way, there should be plenty of room on the DVD, since they put the pan and scan version on the other side of the disc. I've run into a few DVDs like this and it pissed me off every time."
The saga continues ...
jalenross | Germany | 12/20/1999
(5 out of 5 stars)
"What everybody should know about 2010: It is not 2001! Sounds stupid, but it explains about everything. 2010 is the continuation of the storyline of 2001, but it tells the story in a completely different way.2001 was slow and silent. It was filled with emotions and impressions. 2010 offers the same but combines it with a far more interesting plot. On one hand it tells the story nine years after the Discovery Incident, as a team of russian and american scientists try to find answers and on the other hand it explains the fate of Bowman and HAL 9000 ... and ultimately of mankind.The movie never gets boring and keeps you guessing until the end. The actors are marvelous. The hangar scene between Floyd (Roy Scheider) and Bowman (Keir Dullea) alone is better than any other scene in 2001. The russian/american conflict may be a bit out of date (! ), but it never spoils the movies true message. 2010 is not better than 2001. It is different. It is the answer to a question and the beginning of a new one. You have to watch this film. And i also recommend the other two (book) sequels from Arthur C. Clarke (2061 and 3001)."
Very poor Picture Quality
Rallyfirst | 05/03/2009
(2 out of 5 stars)
"until now I had only the DVD Version from 2010. The quality of this DVD was very bad. No anamorph 16:9, bad picture Quality and sound. So I to get excited about the fact, that the Blu-Ray apears. I can say that it is better than the DVD OK but it is the worst Blu-Ray I ever owned. The "picture quality" is blurred, grained and the sound has no dynamic. OK, thats the best quality you can earn but sorry, for Blu-Ray very bad."
"...I Want To Play A Game With You Dr. Floyd...It's Called T
Mark Barry at Reckless Records, Lon | UK | 08/21/2009
(3 out of 5 stars)
"*** THIS REVIEW IS FOR THE "BLU RAY" VERSION Of "2010..." ***
When MGM began making "2010: The Year We Make Contact" in February 1984, the CD was in its infancy, nothing was digital and portable and the Internet and the global sharing of ideas and images was non-existent. Showing its film age badly - in one particular scene Roy Schreider even talks of information being given to his astronauts on 'cassettes' - on board a Jupiter spaceship mission for God's sake! Even the television monitors were black screens with monosyllabic block lettering on them and nothing else... Why mention all of this, because it has of course - in some places - dated the film very badly...
But - and this is a big but - for its time (finally released in 1985), "2010" was an extraordinary vision and a technological marvel. It provided the moviegoer with a superbly detailed and realistic depiction of future space travel, shots of the majestic Jupiter and its moons Io and Europa that were and still are incredibly accurate. Even the story of the Americans and Russians coming together so as not to annihilate each other was both relevant and damn good - and made for a great end message by Bowman (Keir Dullea - who looked like he hadn't aged a day since 1968's original "2001"). Throw in model makers from the Star Wars Trilogy, Raiders Of The Lost Ark, Poltergeist and Ghostbusters - and the goodies were bound to be on display and they are. Which brings us unfortunately to the bad news...
...this is one of those instances where the enhanced BLU RAY image has only worsened an already hazy print...
You see - once you go from the entirely model-led outside shots (say of outer space) which are clean, beautiful and impressive to look at - into the interior shots and live action on dimly-lit stages - the blurriness and shading act as a direct contrast to the clarity you just saw - it drive you nuts. And because a good 70 to 80% of the movie is 'inside' - the effect of the wonderfully realized and designed interiors is almost completely lost. It's like watching Aliens without the clarity - or Star Wars on blurry videotape. It's as if a heavy filter hangs over every frame - and it makes the BLU RAY picture feel and look very dated.
Don't get me wrong - the picture 'is' lovely in some places - but in the main - it's not - which is a huge disappointment.
The only real extra is a 10-minute 1984 'making of' called "2010; The Odyssey Continues" which is fascinating and contains very brief interviews with all the principals - Roy Scheider as Dr. Floyd, Helen Mirren as the Russian pilot Tanya, John Lithgow as Dr. Curnow, Elya Baskin as the loveable Russian Max, Bob Balaban as Chandra the genius who created Hal-9000 - Discovery's malfunctioning computer (voiced by Douglas Rain). There's interesting stuff too with Richard Edlund the model maker - the make-up people - interior designs - even words from author Arthur C Clarke and director Peter Hyams about the screenwriting process in 1983 when they were prepping for the film.
I really had such high hopes for this BLU RAY release, but unfortunately I'd say hire it first before you buy...
The film was - and still is - excellent - an impressive one even. But this BLU RAY reissue of it is anything but.
It's not "full of stars" folks, it's pushing three.
And what a shame that Roy Scheider is no longer with us..."
Bad blu ray transfer
Speedking | Florida | 08/07/2009
(1 out of 5 stars)
"I had seen a few reviews pertaining to 2010, but dismissed some customer comments about the blu ray quality. The sad part is it's true. This is by far the worst blu ray I have ever purchased. The strange part is that I had this movie on my HD DVR and the HD quality was good, but the blu ray transfer is horrible. I'll just try to unload it at a pawn shop and try to salvage something out of it. I have been fortunate in my blu ray purchases, this it the first mistake I made."