Search - The People vs. Jean Harris on DVD


The People vs. Jean Harris
The People vs Jean Harris
Actors: Martin Balsam, Ellen Burstyn, Peter Coyote, Richard Dysart, Sarah Marshall
Director: George Schaefer
Genres: Action & Adventure, Drama, Television
PG     2005     3hr 0min


    
3

Larger Image

Movie Details

Actors: Martin Balsam, Ellen Burstyn, Peter Coyote, Richard Dysart, Sarah Marshall
Director: George Schaefer
Genres: Action & Adventure, Drama, Television
Sub-Genres: Action & Adventure, Drama, Television
Studio: Trinity Home Ent
Format: DVD
DVD Release Date: 09/06/2005
Release Year: 2005
Run Time: 3hr 0min
Number of Discs: 1
SwapaDVD Credits: 1
Total Copies: 0
Members Wishing: 0
MPAA Rating: PG (Parental Guidance Suggested)
Languages: English

Similar Movies

Voice of the Heart
Director: Tony Wharmby
5
   NR   2006   3hr 58min
   

Similarly Requested DVDs

Nothing But the Truth
   R   2009   1hr 48min
   
Selena
Director: Gregory Nava
   PG   1997   2hr 7min
   
I'll Be There
Director: Craig Ferguson
   PG-13   2004   1hr 45min
   
Christmas With the Kranks
Director: Joe Roth
   PG   2005   1hr 39min
   
Manna from Heaven
Directors: Gabrielle Burton, Maria Burton
   PG   2005   1hr 59min
   
Bee Season
Directors: David Siegel, Scott McGehee
   PG-13   2006   1hr 44min
   
 

Movie Reviews

Before there was court TV
Maureen Ogorman | USA | 01/18/2005
(3 out of 5 stars)

"A Televised drama of the trial of Jean Harris. The infamous headmistress of an exclusive girls school who shot and killed her lover Dr. Herman Tarnower. The victim was the author of a best-selling diet book, which brought the case even more notoriety.

This video confines itself exclusively with the trial. No background on the case is given and only slight introductions to the lawyers and the judge as the drama opens. Confusing to people who are not familiar with the case and repetitive to those who are.

There are no special features on the DVD


From the video:

"Based on a transcript of the trial of jean Harris. Some of the testimony presented here is not in the same order as given during the trial.

Because the proceedings took more than three months to complete, much of the testimony and lawyers' statements, arguments, and objections as well as rulings and charges of the judge in this case have necessity been abbreviated or omitted."

"