Fascinating, yet how actually interactive is it?
Alberto Farina | Milano, Italy | 11/21/2002
(4 out of 5 stars)
"Just a small note to add to others' reviews: I'd say that the promise of interactivity adds to the movie more than its *actual* interactivity. I saw the film twice, the second time giving ridiculously different answers to the tests, and I got back to the very same ending. However, the possibility of exploring interviews with the characters and extra clues enhanced the experience of the film very much, and way beyond its actual movie-of-the-week merits. A nice experience, but one is left wondering how better it could have gotten (and look forward to a further and bolder experiment in storytelling)."
Good movie, bad acting
Kaiden Fox | www.lylyth.org | 04/21/2003
(4 out of 5 stars)
"The acting leaves a little to be desired. Combined with the natural lighting, it gives a very "student theatre" or "80's movie" feel to it. Also, unlike "Tender Loving Care," POV's questions are overt. Because of this, most people will have the same ending.The soundtrack, though, does lend strength to the movie."