Search - Timeline (Widescreen Edition) on DVD

Timeline (Widescreen Edition)
Widescreen Edition
Actors: Paul Walker, Gerard Butler, Billy Connolly, Frances O'Connor, David Thewlis
Director: Richard Donner
Genres: Action & Adventure, Drama, Science Fiction & Fantasy
PG-13     2004     1hr 56min


Larger Image

Movie Details

Actors: Paul Walker, Gerard Butler, Billy Connolly, Frances O'Connor, David Thewlis
Director: Richard Donner
Creators: Brian Read, Derek Hoffman, Don Granger, Gary Levinsohn, George Nolfi, Jeff Maguire, Michael Crichton
Genres: Action & Adventure, Drama, Science Fiction & Fantasy
Sub-Genres: Richard Donner, Drama, Science Fiction & Fantasy
Studio: Paramount
Format: DVD - Color,Widescreen,Anamorphic - Closed-captioned
DVD Release Date: 04/13/2004
Original Release Date: 11/26/2003
Theatrical Release Date: 11/26/2003
Release Year: 2004
Run Time: 1hr 56min
Screens: Color,Widescreen,Anamorphic
Number of Discs: 1
SwapaDVD Credits: 1
Total Copies: 8
Members Wishing: 0
MPAA Rating: PG-13 (Parental Guidance Suggested)
Languages: English, French
Subtitles: English
See Also:

Similar Movies

Beowulf Grendel
Director: Sturla Gunnarsson
   R   2007   1hr 44min
Dear Frankie
   PG-13   2005   1hr 45min
Dracula 2000
Director: Patrick Lussier
   R   2001   1hr 39min
Reign of Fire
Director: Rob Bowman
   PG-13   2005   1hr 41min
   UR   2002   2hr 57min
The Time Machine
   PG-13   2002   1hr 36min
Lara Croft Tomb Raider - The Cradle of Life
Full Screen Edition
Director: Jan de Bont
   PG-13   2003   1hr 57min

Similarly Requested DVDs

Reign of Fire
Director: Rob Bowman
   PG-13   2002   1hr 41min
King Arthur - The Director's Cut
Widescreen Edition
Director: Antoine Fuqua
   R   2004   2hr 22min
Director: Baz Luhrmann
   PG-13   2009   2hr 45min
Big Fish
Director: Tim Burton
   PG-13   2004   2hr 5min
Burn After Reading
Directors: Ethan Coen, Joel Coen
   R   2008   1hr 36min
The Brothers Grimm
Director: Terry Gilliam
   PG-13   2005   1hr 58min
Director: Michael Bay
   UR   1999   2hr 30min
Single-Disc Widescreen Edition
Director: Timur Bekmambetov
   R   2008   1hr 50min
Widescreen Edition
Director: Joss Whedon
   PG-13   2005   1hr 59min
Director: Clint Eastwood
   R   2009   2hr 21min

Member Movie Reviews

Edna H. (tessiss) from FRANKLINVILLE, NC
Reviewed on 7/26/2011...
i like this type of show where you go back in time an then return but with consequences
1 of 2 member(s) found this review helpful.
NANETTE G. (radientred) from MOSCOW, ID
Reviewed on 2/16/2010...
I think this is an excellent little epic movie. Gerard
Butler is such a good actor in my book. Avery interesting tale and love story of sorts.
2 of 2 member(s) found this review helpful.
Marianna S. (Angeloudi) from HOLIDAY, FL
Reviewed on 12/23/2008...
Based on the time travel novel by Michael Crichton, Timeline takes us back to the year 1357, during the 100 Years War, to a battle for La Roque between the French and the British. Modern scientists have secretly discovered a "wormhole"- a portal through which people and objects can be transported back to April 4, 1357, to the scene of a pivotal battle. Several archaelogists and historians are sent back to rescue a professor, who was "stuck" back in the 14th century. Very exciting battle scenes make this movie quite thrilling.
4 of 6 member(s) found this review helpful.
Jennifer F. (KnJFisher) from GILLETT, PA
Reviewed on 12/14/2008...
I think this was actually a made for tv movie, it plays like one! Terrificly bad acting, terrible story line, horrible accents, ven the "romance story line" was icky, as the two actors have NO chemistry.
2 of 7 member(s) found this review helpful.

Movie Reviews

Lawyeraau | Balmoral Castle | 05/06/2004
(3 out of 5 stars)

"This film is based upon Michael Crichton's marvelous best selling book of the same name. When I first heard that a film was in the making, I was really looking forward to viewing it, as I absolutely loved the book. That it was in the theatres for just about the blink of an eye, however, gave me the idea something might be wrong with it. Having viewed it, I now fully understand why its sojourn in theatres was relatively brief.Unfortunately, the film bears little resemblance to the author's finely crafted time travel tale. Jeff Maguire, having written a screenplay that seeks the lowest common denominator, just about destroys the author's work, reducing it to an almost incomprehensible piece of drivel. The screenplay takes a five star book and turns into a film that barely rates three stars. Here, a young group of archaeologists and historians are excavating the ruins of a fourteenth century feudal town in France, which excavation is funded by the International Technology Corp (ITC), a well-heeled, corporate giant. Some of the archeological finds are puzzling, as they seem to be anomalous to the time period. Moreover, the leader of the archaeological dig, Professor Johnson (Billy Connelly), has suddenly headed back to the states to ITC headquarters, and they are unable to get in touch with him. They are then all summoned to ITC headquarters by Robert Doniger (David Thewlis), the head of ITC.At ITC, they are told that the Professor has been transported by ITC back to fourteenth century France through a worm hole that ITC has inadvertently discovered. Unfortunately, the professor has not returned, and ITC wishes to send them back in time through the wormhole to help with the rescue of the Professor. It appears that their help is needed in order to navigate the intricacies of medieval life. One of them, Chris (Paul Walker), is the Professor's own son, so he needs no urging, Besides, he has a crush on one of his colleagues, Kate (Frances O'Connor), who is also ready to roll. Another, Andre Marek (Gerard Butler), is a romantic in love with a bygone time, and he. too, has no problem in going through the wormhole and landing in fourteenth century France. You know the screenplay is bad, however, when Francois, the only one who is reluctant to go through the wormhole, is told that he is needed because he is the only one who speaks French, as if the French spoken today were the same as that spoken in fourteenth century medieval France! This would have been a line better left unsaid, as we all know that the French and English spoken today bear little resemblance to that spoken in early medieval times. It is a piece of information about which viewers always automatically suspend belief. Garbed in clothing that is constructed to resemble that which the people of the fourteenth century would wear and carrying time travel markers that will enable them to return home, they go through the wormhole. When our intrepid time travelers, led by ITC security chief Frank Gordon (Neal McDonough), arrive in fourteenth Century France, they are immediately set upon by a marauding bunch of armored English knights, wherein their ranks are immediately thinned. They proceed into the town, where their ranks are further thinned. There, they find the Professor, when they are auspiciously imprisoned with him. Kate, who has excellent climbing ability, manages to help them all escape. They then split up, with Marek, incurable romantic that he is, forging on in his own way to help the Lady Clare (Anna Friel), a French noble woman whose fate spurs Marek on to acts of great chivalry. They are all brought together for the historic battle between the English and the French over control of the town. There, the English are led by the ruthless and evil Lord Oliver (Michael Sheen), aided by a rogue knight named De Kere (Marton Csokas), who is really none other than a transplanted ITC employee. Marek finds himself fighting against the English in order to save the Lady Clare and makes a split second decision that will forever change his life.The production values in the film are excellent and the direction is fine, as it is directed by none other than Richard Donner (The Omen, Lethal Weapon, Superman). The battle over the town provides some terrific action scenes. The actors themselves are also fine. They all do their best with the little with which they have to work. In the leading man category, however, Paul Walker is bested by Gerard Butler who is engaging as the romantic hero, Andre Marek. In the leading lady category, Anna Friel shines as Lady Clare, besting Frances O'Connor. The problem is that their is little chemistry between Paul Walker and Frances O'Connor. There is, however, chemistry between Gerard Butler and Anna Friel. Unfortunately, they are all done in by the simply dreadful screenplay for which Jeff Maguire should be flogged. If one rabidly enjoys medieval festivals and/or time travel stories, or if one loved the book upon which this film is based, then one will garner a modicum of enjoyment out of this film. If not, deduct one star from my rating. In any case, all who are inclined to see this film should rent, rather than buy, it."
Night Arrows!
Robert Graves | Thompson Station, TN USA | 02/01/2004
(1 out of 5 stars)

"Because I loved this book so much I was expecting very little from the movie. That's how it generally works with Michael Crichton, and I've learned my lesson after Congo, Sphere, and Lost World, all great books and poor movies. And even with making such low demands on the film, it still topped them all. This is possibly Crichton's best novel and definitely the worst adaptation, maybe the worst adaptation of any popular fiction book ever.Timeline failed on every level which a movie can fail. The acting was atrocious by just about everyone who had the misfortune to be involved, the adaptation is a shred of what the original story is, the dialogue sounded as though it were made up on the spot by the actors, the 14th century realism was on the level of Bill and Ted's Excellent Adventure, and the casting couldn't have been worse if you'd been trying. The whole movie had a low budget feel to it, producing a result I would've expected ten or fifteen years ago before audiences really cared. The movie (not the novel) is about several archeologist/graduate students who travel back in time to rescue their professor who's been trapped in 14th century France. They only have six hours to do it or else they're forever stuck there. Nobody can go back and rescue them after their six hours have expired, despite the fact that that's exactly what they are doing to the professor. Once they have journeyed back in time things start to go predictably wrong in the past and in the present. Using their knowledge of history, the archeology kids manipulate the armies of England and France while trying to fix various anachronisms they've introduced and not create new ones in the process. There's love, war, even unintentional comedy. What more could you ask for in a film?Answers below.1. Acting - I'm going to just say it: Paul Walker (Chris) is the worst male actor I've ever seen in a major-budget movie. Hands down. Worse than Keanu, worse than Vin Diesel. The only thing that helps him in this movie is Frances O'Connor (Katie) who is, amazingly, even worse. What makes it so unbearable is that the storyline keeps Paul and Frances together for most of the movie, so we get to see these two gems with no one else on screen to hide behind. In the spirit of honesty, I have to say that I've seen better acting in porn. I hope for the sake of film that Paul Walker isn't the flavor of the month long enough to ruin more potentially good films, not that Timeline is really in that category.2. Plot - The adaptation of Timeline drastically departed from Crichton's novel and in all the wrong directions. I realize that certain aspects must be changed from a book to make the movie work, but there's a certain point at which the story can become so severely mangled that any reason for the story existing in the first place is gone. That's what happened to Timeline. Why was Timeline a huge bestselling novel? Because it was the first technically plausible time-travel story that we'd ever read. It combined detailed fact with fiction in the seamless way only Crichton can do it. And it painted a realistic picture of how such technology might be exploited if they were developed. Without that, it's just another brainless sci-fi story. Now here's the point - *none of those things made it into the movie!* That's what made it great, and none of it's there. The result is a convoluted mess that is hard to follow even if you know the rough storyline.3. Realism - Director Richard Donnor made it a point in an interview to state that he was going to favor actual sets instead of special effects. I'm all for this generally - if you're actually going to put some work and money into it. One problem that epics such as Braveheart and Lord of the Rings have created is that half-hearted offerings such as Timeline are pallid and limp next to them. Half a dozen English soldiers clumsily drawing their swords while dramatic music plays just isn't going to cut it. Nor are "night arrows," which, though I'm not a history expert, I'm pretty certain never existed as a legitimate military threat, certainly not on the cunning level of warfare mastery with which they are depicted in Timeline. And the "If we don't leave it here then we'll never find it in the future!" moments give me another reason to cite Bill and Ted as a comparison.If Michael Crichton wants a good movie made out of one of his books, apparently he's going to have to write the screenplay himself as he did with Jurassic Park. I understand that he pioneered a new kind of contract with Timeline, accepting a percentage of the Box Office in lieu of a set dollar amount. I have to wonder how he felt about that decision after seeing the first cut of this epic disaster."
A Great Book Gets Butchered Again
Randy B. Yates | Battle Creek, MI USA | 11/27/2003
(1 out of 5 stars)

"I went to see the first showing of Timeline today and all I can say is I should have stayed home and cleaned the toilet I would have enjoyed the time much better. I am a big fan of Mr. Crichtons books and always am at the bookstore the first day whenever a new one arrives (Sorry Amazon). I read Timeline and was not let down it was great and painted the story as only he could. Therefore, I anticipated that movie and when it came out today, I bought my ticket and corn, sat in my chair centered in the middle of the theater and was insulted with a 119-minute ambush or crap. The storyline was a vague interpretation of the book if the screenwriter was on a three day drunk. There was no story set up they assumed you read the book. The high-tech toys were poor and not true to the book and the mid evil times are better depicted at a junior high school theater group. The actors lean too much on regional dialect and poor acting is ramped. My suggestion is to re-read the book and let your mind paint the picture."