Chad B. (abrnt1) from CABERY, IL Reviewed on 3/10/2011...
Pathetic. This film drags badly, has no actual sacres and fails to be at all entertaining. A cheaply made end of the world flick. It has major problems throughout. Watching paint dry would be a far more enjoyable way to pass the time.
2 of 2 member(s) found this review helpful.
Monica P. from DENVER, CO Reviewed on 1/1/2011...
Definitely one of the better of the After Dark series. If you don't ask to many questions and just enjoy the ride the movie is suspenseful and satisfying. Cameos from such faces as Michael Madsen and Vinnie Jones lend a little menace as well. A good low budget movie.
2 of 2 member(s) found this review helpful.
Sarah H. (psychogurl13) from CROSSVILLE, TN Reviewed on 4/24/2009...
You read the back of the dvd case and it makes this movie sound similar to the Resident Evil movies. The case is misleading. The movie is good and has an interesting plot. Of all the Horrorfest movies, this could be one of the least predictable.
4 of 4 member(s) found this review helpful.
Movie Reviews
I just want everyone to die...
Biz | 04/06/2008
(2 out of 5 stars)
"I am committed to watching every single movie in the After Dark Horror Fest series. Not just this year but last year too. I was doing well for awhile. I hit on Borderland and Mullberry Street last weekend and thoroughly enjoyed both of them. After watching those two movies I was pretty excited about the series. I purchased a bunch more of the After Dark movies and had the chance to watch them this weekend. I kinda liked the Hamiltons. Lake Dead, not so much. Read my review...
Last night I watched Tooth & Nail. It presents the familar theme of a massive apocolypse that has wiped out 2/3s of the earth's population. A few annoying survivors have taken up shelter in a hospital. They are hiding from a bunch of idiots who wear medieval armor and look like the members of the rock band Korn. For a while, Michael Madsen is part of this cannabilistic crew of imbeciles but he must have realized the movie was a bust because he exits early on in the movie and his appearance is not noteworthy or inspired. Come to think of it nothing about this movie is noteworthy or inspired so I won't waste any more time talking about it."
What's Eating You?
Chris Pandolfi | Los Angeles, CA | 11/14/2007
(3 out of 5 stars)
"Imagine a future that has seen the end of the world. Now imagine that a virus, overpopulation, nuclear war, a meteor, or even global warming did not cause the end: "We simply ran out of gas." These words were spoken via a voiceover narration at the beginning of "Tooth & Nail," a post-apocalyptic thriller founded on the idea that the world's gasoline reserves will be completely drained by the year 2012. This doesn't sound too devastating, but think about it--no gas means vehicles will be unable to operate, and inoperative vehicles means that vital goods and services can no longer be delivered. But it's even worse than that. No gas also means no electricity, and no electricity means no way of making, packaging, and preserving food. In this new world, most of the population died because they starved to death.
This idea is quite original and interesting. Unfortunately, it's merely the framework for the actual plot, and I'm sorry to say that the plot is pretty weak. It begins as an engaging character study but ends as a brutal, bloody slugfest, and this is bad because it actually tries to be a morality play at the same time. It also relies on a predictable plot twist that doesn't do justice to the originality of the idea--by then, the story was less interesting and more routine. I had high hopes for "Tooth & Nail," simply because it started off so well; it begins with three foragers wandering the streets of Philadelphia, searching for whatever they can use to survive. Ford (Rider Strong) sees a figure running off after slitting a man's throat, and just as he's about to take the dead man's watch, they find a young woman, weak, hurt, and begging for help. Ford opts to leave her, but Dakota (Nicole DuPort) and Shepherd (Patrick Durham) decide to do the more humane thing and take her with them.
For these three foragers, home is an abandoned Philadelphia hospital, and they share it with a number of other survivors. A scholarly-type named Darwin (Robert Carradine) leads this group. Because he spends a great deal of time designing a gasoline-related contraption, he doesn't do much to help the others with their daily chores, such as fixing the water pump and maintaining security. As he's introduced, the passive nature of the followers indicates that he's rapidly losing their respect. Only one--the quick-tempered Viper (Michael Kelly)--vocally opposes Darwin's methods, which puts him at odds with the rest of the group. It gets even worse when the rescued girl enters the picture: her name is Neon (Rachel Miner), and right off the bat, Viper doesn't trust her. Where did she come from? Why is she in Philadelphia? Who was the dead man she was found with? Not knowing the answers to these questions is too risky in Viper's book.
But as it turns out, they have more important things to worry about. A savage band of cannibals called Rovers close in on the hospital, and they begin well-orchestrated attacks every night. Led by the sadistic whistler Jackal (Michael Madsen), their assaults are violent and downright disgusting; they rely on a myriad of weapons to make kills--such as axes, bats enhanced with nails, and meat cleavers--and every death scene features over the top gore effects. According to Neon, who claims to have lost her entire family to the Rovers, they don't rely on dead bodies for food simply because they rot too quickly. This makes sense: fresh meat is always better.
At a certain point, when only a small portion of Darwin's group is left, Neon's knowledge of the Rovers gets her elected as a leader. Not that anyone is comfortable with the idea; if anything, they accept her begrudgingly, more the result of desperation than respect. A plan needs to be worked on soon--the Rovers are getting hungrier, and food is well within their reach.
The rest of the film follows a formula that puts twists and turns ahead of appropriate storytelling; it seemed as if secrets were revealed just for the sake of revealing secrets, of showing how cleverly constructed a screenplay can be. But is this level of structural development necessary? Does the plot really need a hidden agenda to surprise the audience with? In this case, I don't think so; "Tooth & Nail" took the time to introduce an original concept, and it should have been given the chance to actually utilize it. By the end, all we end up getting is a run of the mill shock fest, a film that pays lots of attention to violence and blood but not enough to plot.
Take, for example, the character of Nova (Emily Catherine Young)--she's a mute young girl who clings to Dakota like a frightened child, and she spends a great deal of time rollerblading down the halls of the hospital. This is virtually all we know about her, and that's incredibly disappointing. I wanted to know so much more about her, especially when it comes to her relationship with Dakota. Why do the two share such a strong bond? Is there a pseudo mother/daughter relationship alluded to, here? I unfortunately can't answer these questions. However, I can say plenty about the Rovers: the way they kill; the way they eat; the way some of them file their teeth down to sharp points, giving them the authentic look of carnivores. If the intention of "Tooth & Nail" was to be a gory exploitation film--and it seems to me that it is--then the gas-related framing device is essentially meaningless. That requires more intellectual processing than horror-driven blood and violence can handle."
The end is nigh
Raul Duke | Pittsburgh | 03/22/2008
(5 out of 5 stars)
"ive seen 3 of the "8 films to die for" so far this year, Mulberry St and The Nightmare Man other than Tooth and Nail, and this is deffinitely the best so far. it easily outshines anything from last year in my opinion.
An all star cast(at leased compared to others in the series) led by Rider Strong{Cabin Fever, Boy Meets World} and full of smaller roles by actors you'll probably recognize including two stone cold tough guys Michael Madsen(Resevoir Dogs, Kill Bill 1+2) and Vinnie Jones {Snatch, Lock Stock and Two Smoking Barrels) major bonus points for including those two. Rachel Miner{Penny Dreadful} has a relatively large role as well.
Basically its the story of a group of survivors trying to stay alive after society has fallen apart due to all gasoline supplies being quenched. A group of cannibals taking survival of the fittest a bit too far makes matters much worse.
The origin story is very original. all gasoline has been drained from the earth. all reserves are gone. without gasoline, there is no electricity, theres not even a way transport coal for power at this point. with no transportation of goods, most people die from starvation(2/3 of the world's population) thus setting up out story. there are a few holes, like what about wind and solar power? generally everything is handled really well though.
as the movie starts, it takes some time to get to know the characters and their surroundings. all the sane survivors in the area have barricaded themselves inside a large building to try and stay safe from the dangers of the roaming cannibals. as time goes on we're introduced to the previously mentioned menaces, and believe me, they're ruthless.
there is much better production value than any others ive seen in the series. theres great lighting/camera work that perfectly sets the mood of this post-apocalyptic thriller. great acting all around, and brutally convincing effects make this one heck of a ride. any fans of horror/the apocalypse should at leased give this one a rental."
I love mankind; it's people I can't stand.
Glen B. Hipple | Harper Woods, MI | 12/20/2007
(5 out of 5 stars)
"I found this film to be incredibly interesting and thought provoking. It isn't the first post-apocolyptic thriller I've seen, but it had an angle to the apocolypse that I've not seen done. Quite clever, actually. "We just ran out of gas."
What makes this a great starting point is that it feels like it could be real. It gives us a barren, abandoned landscape yet remains scarily familiar and way too close for the audience's comfort.
Don't get me wrong--the plot isn't perfect, and it does have a few holes--such as where certain people go and what they do during prolonged absences from the action, and some lack of clarity about the timeline--but it also has its very unique and sardonic commentary on what would happen to us if we really did run out of gas.
I think that's the horror aspect of it: Would we really degenerate like that if we DID run out? That is the fear--would I descend to the animalistic level that these characters do? And what's more frightening is that I think people are in fact CAPABLE of it.
I didn't feel the time pass as I watched this film. It kept my interest throughout, and my friend and I discussed it animatedly all the way home. It's cleverly written, and Rachel Miner shows a nice contrast from her work in Penny Dreadful. I'd see it again just to watch for all the twists involved (like everyone taking on car names, which flows in almost without your noticing at first).
I'd definitely recommend it if you don't mind feeling a little creepy about the future afterward."
"Not if I eat you first."
trashcanman | Hanford, CA United States | 07/10/2010
(4 out of 5 stars)
"Tooth and Nail was an entry into the reasonably successful After Dark HorrorFest film festival series, and it's an outstanding one at that. While ADHF titles rarely live up to their advertising as being too extreme for theatrical release, I find them to be almost across-the-board watchable-to-enjoyable. I never trip over myself rushing to see the 8 annual releases, but I don't avoid them either. Pretty decent low-budget horror flicks overall, but never mind-blowing. This one comes to me a couple years late and shapes up to be one of my favorite ADHF films I've seen thusfar. It's kind of surprising that this movie hasn't been done before since cannibalism is a rather common theme in dystopian sci-fi, but it's never to my knowledge been done this way and I very much like it.
Tooth and Nail opens in a world after the end of civilization. No nuclear war, no plague, no meteors, no climate change; not even a zombie in sight. The world ended when we simply ran out of gas. Even as the last drop of oil was pumped from the Earth, Detroit continued cranking out gas-guzzlers, and in our own stubbornness we kept on living like nothing was wrong. But with no fuel for our power plants or the trucks to deliver food, society collapsed almost instantly with mankind killing each other with everyone trying to gather every scrap of what was left for themselves. This may well be the most plausible apocalypse yet. We meet our group of survivors holed up in a large hospital and in pretty good spirits all things considered. They've got food, shelter, sexy time, a benevolent and intelligent leader, and cool nicknames for everyone. There's even the requisite mute kid to dote on. The characters are very well established in typical Stephen King style. Now comes the good stuff. Shortly after rescuing a wanderer (quite the looker, too) from a murderer in Mad Max garb, the band's leader, The Professor, turns up missing with only his glasses and a whole lot of blood to show for it. What follows is a harrowing bit of suspense and terror that was very successful in pulling me into the plight of the survivors. Trapped and surrounded by a gang of brutal cannibals, our heroes/victims face the prospect of losing one of their number each night and each must choose whether to abandon their friends to their fate and attempt to escape by themselves, or stick together and try to repel the invaders. What would you do?
What makes this film work is the suspense of the cannibals only taking one survivor a night, preferring fresh meat. The systematic and methodical nature of the predators stalking their victims through the hospital until one of them makes a kill and then leaving for another 24 hours while the remaining survivors stew in their own terror is what horror is all about for me. And when Michael Madsen (slowly whistling "I've Been Working on the Railroad" as he goes) and Vinnie "Mahogany" Jones are two of the predators, that is some freaky stuff. The story never goes over-the-top and is portrayed quite realistically, which I wholeheartedly applaud. I was literally wracking my brain coming up with escape plans of my own as I watched the film unfold and that is how you spell success in a movie like this. The only reason this doesn't get a higher rating from me is I do feel that the story takes no chances, coming off as a bit standard and the twist was extremely obvious to me almost from the beginning. But honestly, the film does not rely on said twist and really it was more of a realistic portrayal of how such an organization would work in that kind of landscape then a true twist so you can't really blame the filmmaker for exploiting the gullibility of the innocent. It wouldn't work on me, though. Tooth and Nail didn't really thrill me with it's boldness (a little more exploitation would have earned it major bonus points), but it is pretty rock-solid in it's portrayal of post-apocalyptic cannibalism so I'd consider it a must-see for fans of that sort of thing. Slasher fans will be well-served as well. I wanted more gore (I think the 70's cannibal craze kind of ruined me), but what is there is pretty effective so you won't be terribly wanting for violence.
Tooth and Nail is a credit to the ADHF series and shouldn't be missed by those who enjoy exploring the potential horrors of the end of civilization. I've seen better and bolder, but this one absolutely nails down what it is trying to do and serves up legit horror with a strong story and nearly-flawless pacing.
3 1/2 stars, rounded up because post-apocalyptic cannibals are the coolest cannibals of all."