The last remaining member of a slaughtered tribe pursues vengeance against all odds for his family?s murder. When he discovers his target is a brutal, Sauron-like tyrant, his personal quest grows into an all-out war to res... more »cue a nation and exact revenge.
Stills from Wolfhound (Click for larger image)« less
I really liked this movie. Was not expecting much and pleasantly surprised. A combination of Beast Master, Conan, and Lord of the Rings.
Robert G. (rural631) from SPRINGFIELD, MO Reviewed on 2/23/2010...
Starts off like Conan, villagers murdered for sword, boy taken in slavery. Boy escapes and seeks revenge years later. Add a large pet bat. Wardrobe and makeup looks like it's from a Monte Python movie, 2 1/2 stars out of 5.
2 of 2 member(s) found this review helpful.
Excellent Russian entry into fantasy
Haystack | NY, NY | 06/21/2009
(5 out of 5 stars)
"While the cover may promise CONAN and LORD OF THE RINGS, fantasy fans will find a lot of unique elements in Wolfhound beyond those two seminal series. What keeps bringing me back to this film is the imaginative look at early Russian Mythology, particularly the benign gods and how Volkodav (Wolfhound) uses the elements of Good and the Light to defeat the darkness.
Playing Wolfhound is Russian actor Aleksandr Bukharov who invests his brooding protagonist with some very primal realism. The fact his sidekick is a pet bat doesn't hurt.
While the story is something we've seen before, the unique way its told makes it fresh and new.
It takes a lot for me engage in a double dip purchase, but Wolfhound is one of those I am glad to buy again.
If you're into High Fantasy and appreciate unique twists on good vs. evil, you'll enjoy Wolfhound.
SAME INCREDIBLE FEELING AS WATCHING LORD OF THE RINGS!
Explorator | Los Angeles, CA | 08/30/2009
(5 out of 5 stars)
"IGNORE THE NEGATIVE REVIEWS! THEY ARE MOSTLY FOR THE WRONG MOVIE WITH THE SAME TITLE (some werewolf movie) - I am telling you this 'WOLFHOUND' movie is simply INCREDIBLE!!! There are so many people who would LOVE this movie IF they just watched it! I'm a big fantasy movie fan (Lord of The Rings are my favorite movies of all time) and I have to say that the same powerful feeling of being swept away both imaginatively and emotionally while watching LOTR can be found in this epic fantasy masterpiece as well! It's that powerful! This was such an astounding movie experience that I just HAD to get on here and set the record straight! Fantasy movie fans (AND FANS OF 'GREAT MOVIES' IN GENERAL) cannot afford to miss this movie! Negative comments about the special effects are COMPLETELY UNFOUNDED! Most of the special effects are JUST AS GOOD AS LORD OF THE RINGS! That may sound like a stretch but this movie had a huge budget and employed the greatest craftsmen in Russia and beyond. The CGI work is absolutely FLAWLESS and the epic battle at the end is full of jaw-dropping effects that perfectly compliment THE BEST FANTASY MOVIE ENDING EVER! There are a few melodramatic 'Beastmaster' moments (not that that's necessarily a bad thing) in the first 30 minutes but don't let that fool you. This movie matures VERY QUICKLY and becomes an engrossing fantasy adventure filled with very likeable characters, sweeping vistas that will make you want to visit Russia ASAP, and imaginative scenes of sorcery that will totally amaze you! The haunted swamp scene will go down in history as one of the all time greatest fantasy battles ever! (DON'T WATCH WITH THE GOOFY ENGLISH AUDIO TRACK- THAT MAY BE INFLUENCING NEGATIVE REVIEWS - WATCH WITH SUBTITLES FOR A MORE SERIOUS & POWERFUL EFFECT THE WAY THE MOVIE WAS INTENDED TO BE VIEWED) And yes, I'm man enough to admit I actually shed some tears at the end! That hasn't happened since the LOTR movies. This movie deserves SERIOUS ATTENTION! (I envy those who were able to experience it in the theater!) It's an unjustly overlooked modern CLASSIC!"
Good Effort in Sword and Sorcery But Fails in the Action Sce
Woopak | Where Dark Asian Knights Dwell | 08/11/2009
(3 out of 5 stars)
"Based on the novel by Mariya Semyonova and directed by Nikolav Lebedev, "Wolfhound" is a Russian-produced swordplay fantasy that follows the usual formulas set by the 80's movies of sword and sorcery such as "Conan the Barbarian", "The Beastmaster", "Deathstalker" and "the Sword and the Sorcerer". The film may be the most production-extravagant outing by Russia, boasting of elaborate special effects, great set designs and costumes.
In the period of magic, druids and curses, a young boy was left to die in the darkness of the mines. He is the last survivor of a clan called the Grey Hounds; the young boy rose up in slave mines to become a mighty warrior called Wolfhound (Aleksandr Bukharov). Consumed by a lust for vengeance, he sets out on a quest with his companion, a bat who can't fly. He seeks out the ones responsible for his pain, a warrior called the man-eater and a warrior-druid called Zhodoba. Things become a bit complicated for Wolfhound as there are other things that may prove to be much more important. Apparently, the followers of Zhodoba is bent on unleashing an ancient evil called Morana, buried by the ancestors of Princess Elin (Oksana Akinshina) through the power of the God of Thunder. Wolfhound must protect the princess and defend the people of Galirad. The fulfillment of his destiny is at hand...
The film's plot is pretty textbook as with other films of sword and sorcery; a brooding warrior, a princess that needs protection, a mage (played by Andrei Rudensky), a slave boy (Artyom Semakin), a barmaid (played by Eugenia Sviridova), a kindly vision (Natalya Varley) and ancient evil to be awakened by an evil sorcerer. Destiny, love, and honor play a large part in the film's screenplay. There may be nothing wrong in following other successful formulas established (since blockbusters often come from such) but the problems with the film is that the film is a little too brooding and moody. The screenplay introduces all these characters and the narrative appears to be broken into other mini-stories, while the characters may play a part in the film's plot, it feels too episodic and it kind of feels as if the film could've been edited a little better. It spends a lot of time trying to establish Wolfhound's character that he is a good guy, (his background is even told in a song) through the introduction of some characters he rescues. It dilly-dallies too much in unneeded plot devices, that the viewer may become a bit confused.
The action in the film is decent on occasion, but I have to be honest, I have seen a lot better. The swordplay is your usual `hack and slash' with our hero cutting down the bad guys. There is a lot of action, but it is nothing too impressive to the action junkie. It does also get a little repetitive after awhile, Wolfhound swings and the bad guy goes down. The final fight between the hero and Zhodoba is also a little too underwhelming. I do believe that the camera work could have been done a lot better. There seemed to be too much going on the screen that the viewer may become a little lost. The camera work in the action scenes would have done well if it hanged back in a perspective view, so that we can see the action. The fights aren't really as bloody as I would've wished, just an occasional severed arm and bloody stabs. For a sword and sorcery flick to succeed, it has to be more intense, the fight scenes are just a little weak.
The film's strength does lie in the top notch cinematography and art direction. I have to say Marat Kim's photography is movie magic. The film does look nifty, the set designs and costumes are pretty good. The scenes do have the aura of fantasy about them, but not too fantastic that it lacks realism. The camera work consists of birds-eye views, sweeping pan and scans, and awesome scenery. I have no knowledge of Russian history so I can't really say if the costumes are traditional or not. They do look authentic, and even the costumed swords look very real and shiny. I liked this approach because it balances out its fantasy elements with a charm that one can relate to, and keeps the otherworldly fantasy from becoming too elaborate and over-the-top.
The performances are decent for the most part; I thought the main lead played a very good Wolfhound. He does have a brooding personality and fits his role. Oksana Akinshina is definitely charming as the princess Elin, she is beautiful and you could just believe that she is a strong willed princess. The supporting cast is ok, but the "cute" earthbound bat just steals the show. I guess one can blame the convoluted storytelling that the supporting characters aren't as well written as the two leads.
While "Wolfhound" failed miserably in the action scenes, the CGI effects were decent and comparable to the swordplay adventures we've seen through the years. The final act is just a grand display of visual effects; it may look pretty but hardly enough to save the film. I guess I still have this idea that sword and sorcery flicks should have great action scenes and it is just a sin for one to have such weak action. "Wolfhound" will never be a significant entry in the swordplay genre because it dropped the ball with the shoddy action. To its credit, the film is nicely shot and the plot is acceptable but a hero just can't be a convincing hero without him being heroic. He just looks like a big "meanie" with a huge sword...
Rent It! [2 ½ Stars] Video/Audio: 2.35 ratio anamorphic widescreen. The picture is good with some muted colors to convey mood. The 5.1 Dolby Digital Russian Language track is powerful and very clear that you can hear the clanging of swords. There is an English dubbed track. No extra features, the dvd is bare bones.
Better than The 10 Commandments
LIFER BRO | Parts Unknown | 05/08/2010
(5 out of 5 stars)
"Yeah, it is. Don't spend any cash on it, though. You will need to do some dumpster diving, but it will be well worth it. Or you can just wait until your wife systematically destroys your life, then watch it at your bros' house between bouts of uncontrolable weeping, and vomiting blood do to an untreated bleeding ulcer somewhere in your gullet. I figured it would be a steaming pile of gut waste, but if you actually trick yourself into thinking the movie is more than that before you watch it, powering through the first few hours isn't that bad. I mean, sure a lot of it doesn't even make any kind of sense, and the big bad is a Monkeyface ripoff from Willow, but its better than that (no Val Kilmer, no 'little people' either). Beast-ass landscape shots, underdeveloped tit, and arterial blood spraying on everything, and in the midst of it all a true hero whom has never known the 'warmth' of a 'woman'. Dude was a slave for like his whole life, and in those mines the only touch you feel is the hot lash of the taskmaster's whip. That was pretty heavy, what I just said then, but so is this flick. You have got to see it, do what must be done; lie, cheat, steal, covet some dude's wife, or force your own to purchase it with 'her' money, which is actually yours. I'm a veteran, man. Watch this movie, thats all. It isn't good, or great, or even alright I guess, it is EPIC."
Come on Amazon -- there are two different films here
brainwhistle | Westlake Village, CA United States | 03/20/2010
(1 out of 5 stars)
"For some reason, two completely different films that happen to have the same name (the 2008 Russian film at Wolfhound and the 2002 'horror film' at Wolfhound (Unrated Edition)) are getting the same set of reviews posted to both -- some on Amazon, get your site sorted out; this is amateur hour"