Search - Valentine on DVD

Dill W. (Dill) from LITCHFIELD, ME
Reviewed on 9/1/2013...

Okay, I'm a David Boreanaz fan, I'll watch anything he's in. I actually liked this movie, it's not that original though. But there was a cool twist at the end and it made the movie worth watching.

1 of 1 member(s) found this review helpful.

Caroline W. (GamerMommy) from N LAS VEGAS, NV
Reviewed on 5/20/2012...

I like this movie even though it's fairly obvious who the culprit is the whole time. Corny or not, I still whip it out and watch it every Valentine's Day!

3 of 3 member(s) found this review helpful.

Chad B. (abrnt1) from CABERY, IL
Reviewed on 4/23/2011...

This movie is a boring waste of time. the killer is a rip off from a superior 80s slasher film called Alone In The Dark. This is just standard light weight watered down crap. A slasher film without any point.

2 of 5 member(s) found this review helpful.

My bloody valentine

Daniel Jolley | Shelby, North Carolina USA | 10/12/2002

(5 out of 5 stars)

"I think Valentine is a vastly underrated, thrilling horror movie. At its root, it is obviously a slasher film, but this movie features great pacing, true suspense, quite effective musical transitions, and, most importantly, a terrific finish. Valentine not only has a recognizable plot, it incorporates some dandy instances of symmetry that really help tie everything together in the end. I wish I could tell you just how satisfying the ending is. I had my suspicions about the identity of the killer, but several late twists made me doubt my theory, change it, and finally just applaud the filmmakers for essentially keeping me in the dark up until the very end. I know the clues are there all along, and many people may discover the secret well before the final revelation, but this experienced horror fan was kept off-balance throughout. I also have to admit that this movie made me jump a couple of times (and I can't say that about very many horror movies). With significant help from the musical score, suspenseful scenes were really presented well-just long enough to make you grit your teeth but not long enough to become tiresome. In trailers, the movie looks like another Scream (and there are definite similarities), but Valentine stands head and shoulders above the great majority of slasher films. A lot of horror films feature attractive women, but Valentine is in a class all by itself. What you get here is Katherine Heigl, Marley Shelton, Jessica Cauffiel, the charming Jessica Capshaw, and-drum roll please-Denise Richards. Denise Richards is absolutely stunning in this movie-the smoldering, sultry looks, the prayer-answering hot tub scene, and the bedroom scene I won't even attempt to describe. Watching the creepy old detective put the moves on her is rather comical, but you can't blame the guy for trying. I must say I really love the killer in this movie. While the concept of the masked killer is far from original, the cherub mask is a cool, creepy look. This killer also enjoys variety, employing a number of different, equally effective implements of death. He works his way up from your basic knife across the throat and crossbow to broken shards of glass and a couple of really innovative weapons. No two deaths are remotely alike, and you can just tell how much the killer enjoys his/her work. The DVD's energetic club reel of Orgy's song Opticon is great, but I would caution you not to watch it before watching the movie because it does give a little away in terms of who lives and who dies.Valentine has almost everything I want in a horror movie-a creepy killer, gorgeous actresses, all manner of killings, miscellaneous laughs, an actual plot of some complexity, nail-biting suspense, and a less than obvious ending that totally satisfied this horror fan. I would not have objected to some nudity, but this movie really doesn't need it. It's hot, it's sizzling, it's sexy, it's smart, it's a carnival of murderous delight. You won't find many slasher films better than Valentine."

The perfect movie when you're dateless on Valentine's

Dumb Blonde Reviewing | In my bed | 02/15/2005

(3 out of 5 stars)

"This seemed 'appropriate' to watch on Valentine's. I keep getting told it's 'appropriate' to watch certain movies at certain times. The only movie I've ever tried that with (apart from Christmas movies), is Sweet November, which is the perfect movie to watch in November. This seemed appropriate to watch alone (gimme some sympathy please) on Valentine's night.

During the first few minutes, it very obviously steals ideas from a few other movies: the Halloween-style score at the beginning; a guy getting a red liquid thrown over him, similar to the infamous pigs blood scene from Carrie and the young guy's character being called Jason. There are also quite a few, probably unintentional, references to other teenie movies, particularly Scream.

I am not the biggest fan of Denise Richards, as her eyebrows are a little overpowering, and definitely need plucked. Plus, she's too perfect - hopefully not anymore, considering at the time of writing, she has one kid, and another on the way! The rest of the characters were your stereotypical teen slasher cast: the fat girl, who's now thin; all the girls wear tight revealing tops, with everything pushed up around their necks; and the guys look suitably easy on the eye.

However, the movie left you guessing right to the very end, and ends in such a way, that you're still looking confused as to who the killer really was when the credits are rolling. Everyone is thrown in the frame at one point, as it is with all slasher flicks. You're wondering at the end, how some people ended up being there though.

In one scene, Kat tells Dorothy that her boyfriend, Adam Carr (David Boreanaz), is 'no angel'. This is, of course, referring to Boreanaz's hit TV series, "Angel".

The movie looks glossy enough, however it was filmed in only 42 days. David Boreanaz shot his entire character role in less than two weeks. Katherine Heigl had only 3 days to shoot her scenes. She was already committed to TV's "Roswell". And at a cost of $10 million this is the cheapest film to ever have a Superbowl spot.

Jessica Cauffiel's character Lily is set to go to Los Angeles the day after she's killed. In Urban Legends Final Cut (done by the same director?), Cauffiel's character is also set to go to Los Angeles the day after she's killed.

The order in which Jeremy asks the girls to dance is also the order in which they die. The girls' responses to Jeremy's asking them to dance foreshadows their fates. Lily acts disgusted when asked to dance, and is later disgusted when she bites into a chocolate with maggots inside. Paige says she'd rather be boiled alive, and is electrocuted in a hot tub. Dorothy ends up blaming Jeremy for her actions, and Jeremy/Adam later frames her for the murders.

This is an instantly forgettable movie, apart from Denise Richards' (Paige) scene in the hot tub. I will not be setting foot anywhere near a hot tub after watching that. Not that I ever would, but you never know when it might arise. It's your typical teen slasher flick, with no surprises, and a subtle twist at the end. Not mind-blowing, but not falling in the god-awful category either."

Please!!... Begging you not to waste your money.....

M. J Smith | Cottage Grove, MN, USA | 04/19/2002

(1 out of 5 stars)

"...I just finished watching this tragedy of a flick with my sis.. I rarely write reviews and usually they are all goodness and light, recommending a particularly good product. Sorry to say not so in this case, this movie is proof positive that having slick casting, beautiful sets, and a great premise for a killer are not necessarily enough to make a good slasher flick. This film which based on the previews I saw of it looked like another take off on the Scream idea of witty and really well written horror flicks, comes nowhere near its potential. First of all starting off you have very little empathy with any of the victims; everybody that gets killed deserves it, in spades. (I am not even sure why the one girl survived other than the fact that her character was perhaps the least scummy of the group.)Which comes to point two, the acting in this movie was royally bad . To give you an idea how painful the acting was think of standing in the middle of a pile of razor sharp glass with no shoes on, then drill several screws under your thumbs for good measure.. (I know David Boreanaz can do better than this so I was generally dissapointed.) Point three too much was going on, you didn't get to know any of the characters well at all this sorta goes back to the empathy part except that even most of the shallow characters in this film were cardboard cutouts with no depth at all.( Only Dorthy really seemed to be fleshed out really well and she majorly deserved what she got in the end.) Point four The killer really didn't mess around with his victims much, he tended to kill them simple and straight foward there was no suspense only inevatability. Final point it was pretty easy to figure out who the killer was in fact it was so stupidly easy that it slightly shocks you that at the end. Not a good kind of shock by the way , nope this was the shock of the person who has been kicked in the teeth. You will be saying to yourself "That was it? You gotta be kidding me ..." Well I have said all I am going to say about that. Buyer beware if you are looking for a good movie steer clear. (Those who are looking for a new movie to add to their B movie collection this will fit right in.)"