Search - Daniel on DVD

Actors: Timothy Hutton, Mandy Patinkin, Lindsay Crouse, Edward Asner
Director: Sidney Lumet
Genres: Drama
R     2008     2hr 10min

A searing portrait of one young man's quest for the truth about his past. Directed by the legendary Sidney Lumet (Dog Day Afternoon, Before the Devil Knows You're Dead) this moving film stars Oscar® winner Timothy Hutton a...  more »


Larger Image

Movie Details

Actors: Timothy Hutton, Mandy Patinkin, Lindsay Crouse, Edward Asner
Director: Sidney Lumet
Creators: Andrzej Bartkowiak, Bob James, Peter C. Frank
Genres: Drama
Sub-Genres: Drama
Studio: Legend Films
Format: DVD - Color,Widescreen
DVD Release Date: 07/01/2008
Original Release Date: 01/01/1983
Theatrical Release Date: 01/01/1983
Release Year: 2008
Run Time: 2hr 10min
Screens: Color,Widescreen
Number of Discs: 1
SwapaDVD Credits: 1
Total Copies: 0
Members Wishing: 4
MPAA Rating: R (Restricted)
Languages: English

Similar Movies

The Pawnbroker
Director: Sidney Lumet
   UR   2003   1hr 56min
Prince of the City
Two-Disc Special Edition
Director: Sidney Lumet
   R   2007   2hr 47min
Long Day's Journey Into Night
Director: Sidney Lumet
   NR   2004   2hr 54min

Similarly Requested DVDs

Director: Ivan Reitman
   PG-13   1998   1hr 50min
New Line Platinum Series
Director: Gregory Hoblit
   PG-13   2000   1hr 58min
Miss Congeniality
Director: Donald Petrie
   PG-13   2004   1hr 49min
Cabin Fever
Director: Eli Roth
   R   2004   1hr 33min
The New World
Director: Terrence Malick
   PG-13   2006   2hr 30min
Casino Royale
2-Disc Full Screen Edition
Director: Martin Campbell
   PG-13   2007   2hr 24min
Halloween - Unrated Director's Cut
Widescreen Two-Disc Special Edition
Director: Rob Zombie
   UR   2007   2hr 1min

Movie Reviews

History as dramatic fiction
Peter Shelley | Sydney, New South Wales Australia | 03/06/2001
(4 out of 5 stars)

"Sidney Lumet's film is based on the novel The Book of Daniel by E L Doctorow, an obvious use of the Julius and Ethel Rosenberg case of the 1950's. The Rosenberg's were convicted of conspiring to give atomic bomb information to the Soviets, and executed in 1953. Whilst it is believed that the Rosenberg's were justly convicted, what made the case contentious was the severity of their punishment. Doctorow renamed the Rosenberg's the Isaacsons, and uses the Rosenberg myth to explore the dark side of infamy. The film is told from the Isaacson children's point of view, Amanda Plummer who even as a child when her parents were killed, shows indications of her later mental breakdown, and Timothy Hutton who appears to be the stronger of the two. Both have internalised their grief, with Plummer's idealism shown to be as unhealthy as that of her parents, and Hutton's fetish about different methods of execution. We see the children's resentment of their parents because the imprisonment and eventual deaths of the parents cost the children their protection. It's not important to the children whether their parents are innocent. They believe the political activism the parents expressed is self-destructive. Our view of the Isaacson's activism as a demonstration of passion is divided between heroic and foolish, with Mandy Pantikin's Paul Isaacson being the best example, when he collapses at the sight of the electric chair. Is he a foolish coward or would anyone faint in fear at the time of death? (though Mrs Isaacson doesn't). Doctorow (who adapted his own book) casts doubt on the guilt of the Isaacson's to provide for the children's anguish..Hutton interviews survivors of the trial and settles on the theory that his parents were the dupe of the informant, who fingered them in order to deflect attention from the real culprits. Whilst this theory cannot be substantiated, it's more palatable for the Isaacsons than it could be for the Rosenbergs, who the Communist Party wanted us to believe were also framed. Of course this theory requires that there existed a conspiracy, and the film points out that the Soviet's advances in nuclear weapons can be explained by their independent efforts. After all, wasn't it feared that the Nazi's would beat the Americans to the bomb if their invasion of Russia was a success? The alternate theory that there were no culprits and the Isaacsons were merely scapegoats for Cold War paranoia would probably lead both children to suicide. Lumet creates two time frames, distinguished by cinematography Andrejz Bartkowiak's orange tint for the past and blue tint for the Vietnam era that is the present where the children are now adults, and intercuts in memory and with the progression of Hutton's quest. This intercutting works the best with Lumet's set pieces, an anti-Communist ambush after a Paul Robeson concert, and the two executions presented mercifully in long shot, though a final comparative funeral seems false since it's hard to imagine that the Isaacsons would have been allowed a public funeral. It feels like it exists so Lumet could make the parallel. There is a memorable image of the children being passed over the heads of a crowd during a rally, but the extended stock footage that Lumet opens and closes the film with is less successful. I also tend to agree with Pauline Kael's assessment of the Robeson songs on the soundtrack, in her review in her collection State of the Art. She says its a secret rarely let out: Robeson was a monotonous singer and his songs all sound the same (except for one up-tempo number towards the end). When men appear with baseball bats to attack the Isaacsons and other Communist Party members who have heard Robeson sing live, you wish they would use their bats on Robeson's arranger instead. Lumet has the reputation for encouraging his actors to yell, a point taken to near parody by the hysteria of Julie Bovasso as Patinkin's sister who is lumbered with the children when both parents are arrested, and Patinkin is probably the worst offender. However Lindsay Crouse as Mrs Isaacson is a touching mother and I also liked the polite hostility of Carmen Matthews as the widow of the Isaacson's lawyer. Hutton is all hair and beard but Amanda Plummer has a Judy Garland-ish vulnerability, with a scene where he tries to rouse her out of her madness and she returns to the solace of her foetal position in a dance-like move."
Historical drama with magnificent actors
K. Silber | Berkeley,CA | 08/02/2008
(4 out of 5 stars)

"Timothy Hutton is luminous in this film, as the fictional son of the Rosenbergs. He should have own an award for this portrayal. All the actors, so many well known now, and including the children portraying the young Daniel, are wonderful. There are layers of story unfolding, and the layers are punctuated by the singing of Paul Robeson at intervals, giving a depth and weight to the already intense story. A few viewers may not like the parts where Daniel talks about the many forms of execution, but this is a small part of the film. I recommend this film to anyone who lived through the 60s, and interested in the many films directed by Sidney Lumet. Superb."
Daniel 1983
sweeneyrules | Los Angeles, CA United States | 05/28/2008
(4 out of 5 stars)

Not a review, just filling in what's missing from this page.
I haven`t seen the movie but I loved the book.

Director Sidney Lumet's 1983 fictional film from E.L. Doctorow's novel (he also wrote the screenplay) is finally coming out on DVD. It's more or less about the son of Julius and Ethel Rosenberg dealing with life in the 1960's.

This was Timothy Hutton's follow-up to Taps and his oscar winning performance in Ordinary People.
The cast also includes Mandy Patinkin, Lindsay Crouse, Edward Asner, Ellen Barkin, Tovah Feldshuh and Amanda Plummer.

After a couple of forgettable flicks, Lumet explored similar themes, the children of radicals, with Running On Empty in 1988."