Search - Gag on DVD

James B. (wandersoul73) from LINDALE, TX
Reviewed on 6/18/2009...

An okay low budget horror show.

3 of 6 member(s) found this review helpful.

Not for the weak stomach

Marcia Morales | HOB | 10/23/2007

(4 out of 5 stars)

"At first the movie seems slow paced and boring but when the gruesome parts begin, you'll know it and it's not easy to watch. Incest and child abuse are the two things that turn my stomach and in this movie, the incest made my stomach do flips. I stopped watching the movie with another 30 minutes to go because I just COULDN'T watch it. I do recommend the movie if you want your butt to cringe but I don't recommend it to the faint heart."

Amateur Night at the Bijou...

LeviDevi "Bubman" | Frankfort, KY USA | 11/28/2007

(1 out of 5 stars)

"First, let me say, the only GOOD thing about this movie is I didn't buy it. The second good thing is it came as a "free" rental. Now for the bad part...

My title best describes this because the movie is so poorly made, so poorly acted, so poorly edited, and so poorly directed, it numbs better than an shot of novocaine you'd get at a dentist's office. The premise is two burglars break into a mansion in the Hollywood Hills(?) in search of "treasure"--why, you'll never know. They come up empty at the main house and decide to tool on down to the guest house where...BINGO...they find a safe--and a beaten body of a man bound and gagged on a set of box springs (sans mattress). Deceased Chicago Tribune reviewer Gene Siskel used to say "ask yourself if you would act this way" to gauge the believability of the movie. If you do here, the movie is over in 10 minutes. Not only do the burglars go about their business as if NOTHING is on that bed, they don't even try to free the man. One of the burglars keep saying, "let's get out of here;" the only can only reply, "not till I get that f***iing money." You never know why they need the money (of course I may have slept through that part) and, you know what, I really didn't care. And if that's not bad enough, they get TWO MORE OPPORTUNITIES to get the hell out of Dodge, but stay right there.

All I ask from any movie is to entertain me, although I'll be the first to admit I'm not that easily entertained. But when a director decides to hell with any kind of logic and, in turn, winds up insulting any person with one remaining brail cell's intelligence, THAT'S when I get really ticked off.

Other reviews have said how twisted and sick and gruesome and blah, blah, blah, this movie is. I guess it is--if you like grade D trash complete with brown blood and the absolute WORST makeup you'll ever see.

This enormous bowel movement is 81 minutes long and I swear it's unwatchable. As badly as I despised HOSTEL, I would rather watch that again than have to come within a country mile of this. Oh, lest I forget, it was gaggingly directed (and I use that term VERY loosely) by Scott W. McKinlay."

THIS WAS A TOTAL WAIST OF MONEY!!!!!!

William Berry | 11/20/2007

(1 out of 5 stars)

"I just bought this movie a couple days ago because I read the reviews of it on amazon.I am a BIG horror movie fan I perfer the 80's american & italian horror movies.I just figured hey I'll try it.GRANTED I have lots of good movies from just listening to peoples reviews & going based on the amount of stars.BUT THIS MOVIE REEEEEALLY SUCKS!The people who put good reviews about this movie must not have ANY taiste in horror movies AT ALL.If you are reading this take it from a REAL horror movie fan DON'T GET IT!!!!!!!!!YOU'LL WAIST YOUR MONEY.The cover is deceiving it may look good but it really isnt.It looks like something from SAW (the cover)that's how they get you."