Search - The Master and Margaret (Il Maestro e Margherita) on DVD

The Master and Margaret (Il Maestro e Margherita)
The Master and Margaret
Il Maestro e Margherita
Actors: Ugo Tognazzi, Mimsy Farmer, Alain Cuny, Velimir 'Bata' Zivojinovic, Pavle Vujisic
Director: Aleksandar Petrovic
Genres: Indie & Art House, Drama, Science Fiction & Fantasy
NR     2003     1hr 35min


Larger Image

Movie Details

Actors: Ugo Tognazzi, Mimsy Farmer, Alain Cuny, Velimir 'Bata' Zivojinovic, Pavle Vujisic
Director: Aleksandar Petrovic
Creators: Roberto Gerardi, Aleksandar Petrovic, Arrigo Colombo, Amedeo Pagani, Barbara Alberti, Mikhail A. Bulgakov, Roman Wingarten
Genres: Indie & Art House, Drama, Science Fiction & Fantasy
Sub-Genres: Indie & Art House, Love & Romance, Science Fiction & Fantasy
Studio: Vanguard Cinema
Format: DVD - Color - Subtitled
DVD Release Date: 03/25/2003
Release Year: 2003
Run Time: 1hr 35min
Screens: Color
Number of Discs: 1
SwapaDVD Credits: 1
Total Copies: 0
Members Wishing: 1
MPAA Rating: NR (Not Rated)
Languages: Italian, Serbo-Croatian
Subtitles: English

Similar Movies

Paris Je T'Aime
Paris, I Love You
Directors: Wes Craven, Gus Van Sant
   R   2007   2hr 0min

Similarly Requested DVDs

The Number 23
Unrated Infinifilm Edition
Director: Joel Schumacher
   R   2007   1hr 38min
Love's Enduring Promise
Director: Michael Landon Jr.
   UR   2005   1hr 27min
Star Wars - Episode III Revenge of the Sith
Widescreen Edition
Director: George Lucas
   PG-13   2005   2hr 20min
The Omen
   R   2006   1hr 50min
Senior Skip Day
Director: Nick Weiss
   UR   2008   1hr 23min
The Office - Season Two
   UR   2006   7hr 57min
Director's Cut
Director: Wolfgang Petersen
   UR   2007   3hr 16min
Stone Reader
Director: Mark Moskowitz
   2hr 8min
Dirt The Complete First Season
   2007   10hr 7min

Movie Reviews

Amusing rendition of the literary masterpiece.
BT | Brooklyn, NY United States | 07/23/2003
(3 out of 5 stars)

"First of all, the "official" synopsis above is inaccurate. That it is possible for a critic to see the movie and then summarize it incorrectly should serve as a warning that this movie isn't very easy to follow -- unless you're familiar with the book that the movie is based on. Here's a better description of the plot:Master, a Russian playwright, is anxiously anticipating the premiere of his new play. In the post-Revolutionary Moscow of the 1920s, the subject of the play, the encounter between Jesus and Pontius Pilate, frightens Master's conformist peers. In the atmosphere of political oppression and officially encouraged atheism, Master's thoughts on secular power, truth and freedom expressed through the play's characters seem alarmingly relevant to the literary hacks of the newly instituted artistic bureaucracy. Predictably, the play is condemned, but to the aid of the anguished writer come his new acquaintances: a beautiful woman he meets on a Moscow street and a mysterious stranger apparently endowed with supernatural powers who takes a special interest in the play.The movie is loosely based on Mikhail Bulgakov's masterpiece "Master and Margaret". If you haven't read it, you might want to take a chance on this movie -- but I can't predict your reaction to it, as my knowledge of the text makes my judgment very subjective. Ultimately, the movie isn't bad, the acting is adequate, and the plot alone should seem interesting enough to justify watching it.If you have read the book, you must have raised you eyebrows over my synopsis. Like I mentioned, the movie is based on the book only very loosely -- the story line is different and some key characters are missing or merged into one. The movie is certainly not a worthy screen rendition of the original, but it can still be enjoyed. If you've ever given thought to what it would take to bring the book to the screen, you'll be amused by the choices the filmmakers made. In my opinion, a few of these choices were successful -- as in the case of Korov'ev, in one case brilliant -- as in the case of Jesus, but in most cases poor, as in the case of Voland, most unfortunately. The costumes and the makeup belong in a period at least half-a-century earlier, the soundtrack seems largely random, and yet I don't regret having watched the movie. I would have hated it if it was silly -- but it's not, it's just wrong. And what better way to congratulate oneself on a superior interpretation of an artwork than to encounter someone else's serious yet ultimately flawed attempt to repeat it?"
No Sympathy for the Devil
James Ferguson | Vilnius, Lithuania | 05/30/2006
(2 out of 5 stars)

"If the synopsis is any indication of the movie, then it is pretty far off from the literary classic. It wasn't a gulag, but a sanatorium that "Homeless" was sent to, after his confrontation with Woland, the devil, at the duck pond. Other than being a fellow writer, there wasn't much prior relationship between "Homeless" and the "Master." Their relationship developed in the sanatorium.

Bulgakov's novel is a black comedy of the Stalin years, during which time he was director of one of Moscow's famous theatres. This highly theatrical story satirizes just about every aspect of Stalinist Moscow,to the point that it never saw the light of day until the Khrushchev era, when a major thaw took place in the Soviet Union. The Master and Margarita made a huge impact, becoming part of the Russian literary canon. There have been several attempts to capture the novel in film and even on stage, the most recent being a ten-part television serial (January, 2006) by Bortko, who had previously done an excellent rendition of "The Heart of a Dog." But, unfortunately his adaptation (as faithful as it was) fell short of the original as well. Forget the movie and read the book."
Outdated and Unmoving Film
Oslo Jargo | FINLAND | 12/03/2004
(2 out of 5 stars)

"Although the film deals with one of the best known Russian literature writers, the film itself fails on most accounts, namely because it does not deal with the tendency for times to change. With the expulsion of communist Russia, this film no longer has any prominent themes to explore and on top of that, it was done by an Italian filmed on the streets of Belgrade. It is very boring at times with unmotivated and stiff acting by most of the leads and it is a period piece. The ending was the only thing redeeming about it and I would just rate it as an average piece of work.....